MyOpolisHelp Build Greenopolis |
Another GHG...
Submitted by georgesdyer on Mon, 07/14/2008 - 3:12pm.
I just saw the news (below) on the Grist weekly
update (a great news service if you're looking to stay up on the big
events, and stay entertained in the meantime). It is of course not good
news, another example of unintended consequences and how taking a
"quick fix" approach of replacing one substance produced by society
with another can create more problems than it fixes. Both
perfluorocarbons and NF3 violate the 2nd sustainability principle.
There's no doubt that these finding will lead to the regulation of NF3,
and thus represent a risk to LCD manufactures, a hit to their product
line, and a bummer to anyone buying an LCD (to really put a damper on
things, Co-op America just put out a list of energy saving tips that
includes buying an LCD instead of a plasma... of course there are other
solutions to these tough TV dilemmas, like watching on your computer, skipping it altogether!):
If you didn't feel guilty about your TV habits already, here's a new reason: a chemical used in making flat-screen televisions has been found to be a potent greenhouse gas, 17,000 times stronger than carbon dioxide. In a study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, atmospheric chemist Michael Prather called nitrogen trifluoride, or NF3, "the missing greenhouse gas," and warned that the climate could suffer as the chemical is produced in ever greater amounts to meet soaring demand for LCD displays. If all of the NF3 produced in 2008 were released into the atmosphere, it would have as much warming effect as 67 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, the study found -- about the same as the annual CO2 emissions of Austria. NF3 isn't covered by the Kyoto Protocol because it was only being produced in tiny amounts in 1997 when the treaty was negotiated. Ironically, NF3 was developed as an alternative to perfluorocarbons, greenhouse gases that are governed by Kyoto. (2 votes) »
Bookmark This Page |
Featured Thought LeaderGreen Tips
Speaking of GreenLatest Post
Okay, okay so it’s a bit later than expected. But I really wanted to tell you guys about the Green Christmas I had this year.
Iwanted to write and tell you about it earlier, but I couldn’t because Ididn’t want my loved ones finding... Latest Forum TopicI have an older car that gets about 25 miles to the gallon. I'm thinking about getting a hybrid, but the old car still has a lot of miles left on it. I'm thinking that if I change my driving habits and reduce my miles driven by 30%, that's equivalen... Latest Poll1 at a time- I like to drive as much as possible 0% (0 votes) 2-4- I try to double up 25% (1 vote) 5-7- I'm a real multi-tasker 75% (3 votes) 8-12- I scour my to-do list and plan trips to get it all done 0% (0 votes) I don't leave the house unless there's a fire! 0% (0 votes) Total votes: 4 |
Unintended consequences need to be considered
Excellent article on the "other side" of things people take for granted as "being green". There's always another angle to consider and I think the public is only just becoming aware that they need to check these things and not just go with the first Green Tip that is flung at them.
Remember when powering all of our cars using corn was pushed as an entirely green solution?
I saw an article on that
I saw an article on that too
seems like no matter what we do or make, after its already done they always find that it does something harmful in one way or another. We really need to research things prior to using them I think