Think Green Rewards Earned
82,672,276
Total LBs of WMRA Recycled
55,572,185
Recovered by Greenopolis
28,631,911

Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air

PrintPrintE-mailE-mail 2 comments

I came upon a very interesting book the other day that can be read online for free. The title is "Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air" and it is written by David J.C. MacKay, a Cambridge professor. The text can be found at withouthotair.com. The book is almost 400 pages long, but the good news is that if you aren't quite up to this challenge, MacKay also provides a four page summary of his work, which I think is defintiely worth a read. MacKay's main point seems to be that though the potential for renewable energy may be huge, our current demand for energy is more huge (huger?).

The ways in which this discrepancy can be met include nuclear power, population reduction, or lifestyle change. Of the three, lifestyle changes seem to be the most wise from a long term perspective, even if nuclear power may be easier in the short run. Nuclear waste is already piling up from our current nuclear plants, and there just aren't that many options for dealing with nuclear waste. 

MacKay's work definitely opens one's eyes to the current state of our consumption. He states that his main objective was to put numbers to the situation. In other words, we know we use a lot of energy, but how much is a lot? 

Of course, I don't want to discourage anyone from making sustainable changes in their lives. In fact, I encourage everyone to try to reduce their impact and their consumption. At the same time, I do feel that this work does not fully consider the future of renewable technology. In 2008, it would require a large area of land to collect the necessary solar power to keep us moving, but in ten years time the efficiency of these solar panels may have gone through the roof. In fact, it is very reasonable to assume that these technologies will become much more efficient. So perhaps, our lifestyle changes and these improvements in available technology will meet at a happy equilibrium.

Researchers are clearly doing their part. I see stories about new and better solar technologies almost every day. Now it's time to do your part, and make the little changes in your life to make it more sustainable and more supportable in the years to come. 

Share

Comments

I recently toured a nuclear power plant in Florida, my first trip to a nuclear site. During the tour, we visitors from Sustainable Florida were told that the nuclear fuel waste is recyclable. Nevertheless, our tour guide then went on to describe the vaults where nuclear waste will be "safely stored."

Once back inside the office facility, away from the deafening din of the coolers and turbines, I had the opportunity to ask my big question. If the nuclear waste is recyclable, why isn't it being recycled?

The answer was that in order to reclaim the waste for reuse, it must be transported to a processing location. The danger of transporting is the issue. Therefore, putting it into a vault is safer for now.

Like the big trunk in grandma's attic. One day our childrens' children will be faced with opening it. How mean of us to leave such a thing for them to find.

I agree wholeheartedly on the nuclear issue. Why would we want to trade one form of legacy pollution (global warming) for another that is even worse and lasts longer (nuclear waste)? It does not make any real sense but seems to be popular across the pond where they might envision lower prospects for renewable energy.

Bob Ferris
Executive Director
Yestermorrow Design/Build School