MyOpolisHelp Build Greenopolis |
Things You Should Never buy
Submitted by recyclemania on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 1:52pm.
When you go to the store you have a list or an idea in your head of what you need and are looking for. Normally these are things that you want. However, I propose that you should always have this list on hand . . . Things that you shouldn't buy. Ever. Styrofoam Cups - Styrofoam is reuseable, but not really recyclable. A better alternative is reuseable cups (plastic, ceramic, glass etc). Paper Towels - A waste all over the map. It's money that you don't have to spend, and trees that don't have to be cut down. Buy reusable and washable hand and dish towels instead. Incandescent light bulbs - They're inefficient and waste energy in the form of heat. Try buying compact fluorescent light bulbs, which might cost a little more upfront, but last longer and can end up saving you $30 to $36 over the life of each bulb. Conventional Household Cleaners - These products can contain hazardous ingredients such as organic solvents and petroleum-based chemicals that can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into your indoor environment, positing a particular danger for children. The average American household has 3 to 10 of hazardous matter in the home.Instead, look for nontoxic, vegetable-based, biodegradable cleaners or make your own green cleaning products.
Plastic Utensils - They aren't biodegradable and not recyclable in most areas. Disposable Batteries - Batteries contain heavy metals that can leach into the environment. Instead invest in rechargeable batteries and an electric- or solar-powered battery charger. Bleached Coffee Filters - Dioxins, chemicals formed during the chlorine bleaching process, contaminate groundwater and air and are linked to cancer in humans and animals. Look for unbleached paper filters or use reusable filters such as washable cloth filters. Industrially Raised Beef - Industrial cattle operations are energy-intensive, rely on antibiotics and an unnatural corn diet, and generate polluted runoff and large quantities of methane, a greenhouse gas. Limit your intake of beef and choose meat from sustainably raised, grass-fed cows. Hair Conditioner - Many hair conditioners contain ingredients like sodium benzoate, benzyl alcohol that can be toxic. Try using natural oils like olive, safflower or jojoba instead.
Chemical Pesticides and Herbicides - American households use 80 million pounds of pesticides each year. The
EPA found at least one pesticide in almost every water and fish sample
from streams and in more than one-half of shallow wells sampled in
agricultural and urban areas. These chemicals pose threats to animals
and people, especially children. Buy organic pest controllers such as diatomaceous earth. Excessively Packaged Food and Other Products - Excess packaging wastes resources and costs you much more. Around 33% of trash in the average American household comes from packaging. Buy products with minimal or reusable packaging or buy in bulk and use your own containers when shopping. Cling/Saran/ Plastic Wrap - Many people don't realize that cling wrap may be made with PVC. #3 PVC (polyvinyl chloride) leaches toxins when heated or microwaved and it is an environmental problem throughout its lifecycle. Instead store things in reusable containers. Beauty/Body Care with Phthalates and Parabens - Phthalates are a group of industrial chemicals linked to birth defects that are used in many cosmetic products, from nail polish to deodorant. Parabens are preservatives used in many cosmetics that have been linked to breast cancer though more research is needed. Phthalates are not listed on product labels and can only be detected in laboratory tests. To be safe, choose products from companies that have signed on to the Compact for Safe Cosmetics. High Octane Gas than You Need - Only one car in ten manufactured since 1982 requires high-octane gasoline. High-octane gas releases more hazardous pollutants into the air, and may be bad for your car. Instead, buy the lowest-octane gas your car requires as listed in your owner's manual. You can also try making your next car purchase a hybrid. Or ditch the car and take public transportation, ride a bike, or walk. Teak and mahogany - Every year, 27 million acres of tropical rainforest (an area the size of Ohio) are destroyed. Rainforests cover 6% of Earth’s surface and are home to over half of the world’s wild plant, animal, and insect species. The Amazon rainforest produces 40 percent of the world’s oxygen.Look for Forest Stewardship Council certified wood. Try to reuse wood, and buy furniture and other products made from used or salvaged wood. Farm Raised Salmon - Several studies, including one performed by researchers at Indiana University, have found that PCB's and other environmental toxins are present at higher levels in farm raised salmon than wild salmon. Pregnant women, women of child-bearing ages, and children should be very careful when choosing fish due to high levels of environmental toxins including mercury found in many fish. Anything Made with PVC - Polyvinyl chloride, used in everything from shower curtains to residential siding to toys and upholstery, sometimes contains phthalates (to make the plastic softer) that act as endocrine disruptor's, which interfere with normal hormonal development. Buy products made with natural fabrics and sustainably harvested woods instead. High VOC Paints and Finishes - Volatile organic compounds or VOCs can cause health problems from dizziness to lung and kidney damage and are infamous for polluting both indoor and outdoor air. VOCs are found in products including paints as well as finishes used for wood, such a stains or varnishes. There are now a wide array of low or no-VOC paints on the market. Look for paints certified by Green Seal, or look for natural paints made by green businesses. Rayon - Developed and manufactured b y DuPont as the world's first synthetic fiber, it is made by from liquefied wood pulp. Unfortunately, turning wood into rayon is wasteful and dirty, because lots of water and chemicals are needed to extract usable fibers from trees. Only about a third of the pulp obtained from a tree will end up in finished rayon thread. The resulting fabrics usually require dry cleaning, which is an environmental concern as well as an added expense and inconvenience. Much of the our rayon sold comes from developing countries, such as Indonesia, where environmental and labor laws are weak and poorly enforced. There is mounting evidence that rayon clothing manufacturing contributes to significant forest destruction and pollution in other countries.
I am sure there are more, but this is a list that I have put together. If you know of anymore things that should be added to this list let me know! (12 votes) »
Bookmark This Page |
Featured Thought LeaderWould you like to bid on a "carbon credit"? Now that I have your attention: You can! All you need is a minimum financial security of $1,860. And, moreover, you can pretty much do anything you want with the allowance. US carbon trading sta... Green Tips
Speaking of GreenLatest Post
Pack a No-Waste Lunch Box
The idea of lunch brought to and from school in a paper or plastic bag seems so '80s, but the use of an actual lunch box or reusable sack (although they've been around for years, too) is back in style, and choi... Latest Forum TopicSign this petition calling on theClorox Company (parent corporation of Brita) to expand its water filterrecycling program in the UK to all countries in which it sells itsproducts. ... Latest Polldirty water 0% (0 votes) dead trees 0% (0 votes) this is a weird thing to ask 33% (1 vote) niether 67% (2 votes) Total votes: 3 |
Just an Observation
You know it is interesting to read this whole string of comments that started with a sincere and open premise. What things should we not buy or be cautious of if we are serious about living a "greener" life. And in that conversation there have been some thoughtful comments from folks who wish to add to these lists and make them more complete and accurate. And then.....
There are folks who are both lacking in social skills and sometimes facts, who are not respectful in their approach and who are hypercritical. It is their perogative to behave this way, but I'll make an observation. My observation is this: nearly all who have attacked this post or the poster have done so under a cloud. They have joined Greenopolis and not been forthcoming with information about themselves, their affiliations, motivations, or backgrounds. In short, they are not good faith players in the discussion process.
As we design and redesign our own communities, we should look to and listen to those who are open and sincere and wonder about the value of faceless critics.
Bob Ferris
Executive Director
Yestermorrow Design/Build School
Since when do you need
Since when do you need credentials/full disclosure to point out factual errors and sloppy/lazy journalism?
If the member who pointed out the factual error was an affiliate of the hair care industry, would that make any difference? Would working for, say, Procter & Gamble make tocopheryl acetate anything other than Vitamin E?
What possible difference could my personal information, including affiliations, motivation or background, make in pointing out a lack of fact checking?
People have been writing into newspapers for decades (if not centuries) in the "Letters to the Editor" section in response to stories/columns, all without full disclosure. What's the difference here?
Yes
Yes, probably it does. I worked in Washington, DC for nearly 13 years and listened to a whole lot of expert testimony. A lot of it was great, but much of it would have sent the truth meters buzzing. And since you bring up P&G, check out the below link about the FDA action to stop them from making false advertising claims about a hand soap:
http://www.naturalnews.com/022655.html
If they do this on a hand soap for children, you think that misstating facts in an op-ed or a blog is a very high hurdle?
I would also urge you to read the labels on their "natural products." Legislation is now being proposed to define what "natural" actually means. Want to place a bet on how long natural will stay on their labels, if this legislation is passed?
Also while tocopheryl acetate is mostly vitamin E it--as its name implies--it also contains acetate. The chemists would likely claim that helps to get the vitamim E where it needs to be when, but I wonder what the body has to say about that.
Thanks for putting more information in your profile, but I stand by my earlier post.
Bob Ferris
Executive Director
Yestermorrow Design/Build School
Just because it has a scary name doesn't mean it's bad
Yes, many “expert” witnesses bend the truth in rendering their opinion in court to benefit the customer who is paying for their testimony. And yes, many companies use deceitful marketing, fear, or lie/exaggerate claims to sell more product. That’s all a given. But we’re talking about someone pointing out that a listed ingredient is misidentified as toxic/potentially carcinogenic.
A quick check of information widely available on the web confirms this, so it doesn’t matter who pointed it out.
There are a couple of issues here:
I’m no fan of big business, but misidentifying an ingredient as toxic (and, subsequently not correcting the original text), may cause people to avoid using or buying ANY products that contain the ingredient.
You point out that tocopheryl acetate also contains acetate, as if that is a bad thing, but you provide no information/data/proof to substantiate that it is bad. Are you aware that people ingest alpha-tocopheryl acetate in vitamin E supplements and that tocopheryl acetate is in all sorts of moisturizers, lotions, and especially sunblock? Where’s the data that says just because it contains acetate, it’s harmful or bad?
I believe a common mistake people often make, when they see the non-marketing name of an ingredient they are familiar with, is to wholesale brand it as a chemical and believe, therefore, that it’s bad.
Chemo-phobias
Although I will admit that I have occasional nightmares about my organic chemistry professor, I do not have a chemical phobia per se. But I have a science-based skepticism about chemicals being modified and altered to make products more stable for the convenience of the producer and not necessarily for our benefit.
I never said acetate was bad, I said it wasn't simply vitamin E. And to say so is misleading. And if you'll drift back to the original post you'll see that the verbage says something like can be toxic not are toxic.
I suspect that I hung out with too many bio-chemists in graduate school who were so enthralled with their ability to create something "better than nature" and please don't hold up my discovery by testing it. Take that hubrus and lay that out across a landscape disease and syndromes--particularly in children--and stir in our general history as humans of doing the wrong thing for the right reasons and it worries me.
This may seem like this is some esoteric side discussion, but it really is a the heart of what this website is all about. We really have to question everything and technology most of all because it is the belief that it will cure all that enabled us to get to our current deplorable state.
Bob Ferris
Executive Director
Yestermorrow Design/Build School
Adendum
After our interchange on this, I went to the medical literature to see what research was saying at the vitamin E with acetate and I found that there were two main concerns. The first had nothing to do with the compound itself but the impurities that normally were associated with it (they possed health risks) and the second concern was that some folks were developing allergic reactions to the vitamin E compound.
Bob Ferris
Executive Director
Yestermorrow Design/Build School
You sound STUPID when you get things wrong...
...and then your readers won't believe anything you say.
I quote: Many hair conditioners contain ingredients like sodium benzoate, benzyl alcohol and tocopheryl acetate that can be toxic or potentially carcinogenic.
For your information, TOCOPHERYL ACETATE = VITAMIN E. Is vitamin E really toxic and potentially carcinogenic? Wow, thanks for enlightening me. Just because it sounds like a chemical, it doesn't mean it's bad, it's just the scientific name.
So basically, you said a lot of intelligent things in your article, but people who are the least bit knowledgeable, such as myself, will disregard everything you said because it just became invalidated. It makes you sound like you don't know what you are talking about.
Just so you know
My apologies, for you are correct. I did not just pull this information out of no where, I complied it from many other websites and articles etc. I didn't double check the information, so sorry for this inaccuracy.
I know that people have pointed out flaws in what I wrote, but I believe that no matter what you write, someone will find a flaw in it or have something to say about it. My intention was to inform others about these products that are labeled "things you shouldn't buy." Some people won't care, some will, others will try to find everything wrong with it. Who cares. The point is to get people to think, and even research. When we teach or encourage others to learn more, it only helps in what you are trying to accomplish. So even if this article is not perfect, and you don't believe anything or everything, it might encourage you to go out and learn more and that is all I wanted.
If you're going to post, check your sources
Sorry, but using the excuse that someone will always find a flaw in what you write is NO EXCUSE for sloppy journalism.
Publishing inaccurate information (which you have yet to remove from or correct in your post) and claiming "Who cares. The point is to get people to think, and even research" is complete crap. If that's the basis for your moral compass, perhaps you should be writing for The National Enquirer or some other trash magazine. I'm sure they get plenty of people "to think." Right.
CFLs and Mercury
Do you know how much mercury there is in a CFL? Less than 5 milligrams. If you've got an old mercury thermometer or thermostat laying around, that's 500 or more milligrams you have in your house.
It's a no-brainer to recycle CFLs--most communities have a way to do it and even some stores will take them back. If your community doesn't, get involved and get a city ordinance passed!
But EVEN IF YOU THREW CFLS IN THE GARBAGE--and I am NOT recommending this--you would be putting less mercury into the environment in most parts of the country than if you used incandescent bulbs.
That's because 50 percent or more of our electricity is generated using coal, which spews mercury into the air during processing.
Your incandescent bulb uses 5 times as much electricity as a CFL. Over the lifetime of a CFL, the amount of mercury contamination from the electricity for the 5 incandescents you would have used would be higher than what's in the CFL.
And, of course, if you dispose of the CFL by recycling, there's NO mercury contamination at all.
I save my spent CFLs up until I have two or three of them and take them to the recycling center. It's been four years since I last took them in, and I still don't have two to recycle, because they last so long--up to seven years.
I'll try to avoid some
I see some things there that I think I could definitely avoid buying in the future. I'll make them part of my sustainable to do list!
--------------------------
I'd rather be camping!
Good List
This is a good general list of things that are harmful, but it doesn't really get into the intricacies that are involved in seeing whether one thing is more sustainable than another. For instance, people have mentioned the high levels of mercury in CFL bulbs that make them dangerous to throw out and you didn't take into account the pesticides that may be used to create reusable dish towels, the cotton, water, etc.
I've noticed that a lot of choices we make about sustainability end up being trade-offs rather than black and white choices. I agree with pretty much all of your assessments, though, especially the industrially-raised beef!
--------------------
You must be the change you want to see in the world. - Mohandas Ghandi
the poverty
we are Buddhist we don't eat animals at all.
we don't drink coffee as well
we also don't by stuff that kills animals.
we have no money to buy those cops and I myself love drinking from the bottle - also we have some friends that are losing their homes they brought us their glasses in case some guest want to drink
I will try to reduce the paper towels
as for cleaning material simple viniger can solve most of cleaning issue and with a bit sand it can do the dishes great it cleans oils spots and even in laundry it keep the color of the cloths (don't by made in china if you can)
and even if you wash your car with it the color will be looking great
Coffee who? try herbal tea
Hair condition - lol he has not much of hair and my hair is curly and refusing why bother? lol again
who is buying furnitures?
for the first time in my life I feel poverty keep me a saint. thank you ....
may all being be happy
You. Author. Wake UP!
Styrofoam is recyclable and has been for over a decade. In fact recycling styrofoam is economically viable (as opposed to other products not mentioned in your haphazard attempt at an article).
Coffee???
Just because something is recyclable does not address other issues associated with the total lifecycle of the product. The styrene in styrofoam is a health hazzard (that means: not good). This product also uses petrochemicals in its manufacture (not sustainable). There is more but those two alone should put it up for consideration on this list.
Here is a link with some useful information:
http://www.earthresource.org/campaigns/capp/capp-styrofoam.html
Bob Ferris
Executive Director
Yestermorrow Design/Build School
Are you really worried about heavy metals?
From batteries, seriously?
You do know that those CFL have Mercury in them also don't you? Do you think the average person is going to dispose of those properly or do you think they will just end up in the trash? What if one of them break in your house?
Styrofoam
For years I have refused to accept anything that comes in styrofoam. That is some bad stuff that will never go away.
JT
http://www.FireMe.To/udi
Also
How about cigarettes, any perfumed product, air fresheners and deodorizers (even personal), ozone air cleaners, Hummers and SUVs, anything overly packaged, non-energy star appliances, etc., etc., etc.?
Bob Ferris
Executive Director
Yestermorrow Design/Build School
I make my own cleaning
I make my own cleaning products, there so much cheaper and easy to make.
cleaning supplies
Can you give me some recepies
I hope my latest blog post
I hope my latest blog post helps you and answers this question
Great List - I think packaging is a tragedy!
Great list of reminders, hopefully folks can implement most of these suggestions in their everyday lives! My organization is working to take on paper packaging, check out our new website: www.nofreerefills.org
who knew
I never knew hair conditioner was bad! I don't think can go without it though, so I will just have to find once that is green, probably organic!